Future of area high schools a mystery This is a featured page

The community has not agreed on the extent - or the existence - of problems much less how to fix them.

By Maria P. Gonzalez of the Union-Bulletin

Walla Walla High School may one day get new heating and cooling systems, and updated or additional buildings to help relieve overcrowding and address safety concerns.

Or maybe the area will support building another high school instead, and leaving Wa-Hi, for the most part, as is.

Or perhaps the crowding issue will be solved with College Place Public Schools supporting construction of its own high school, which would greatly reduce Wa-Hi's nearly 2,000-student population.

Whether those ideas become reality, precisely what will happen remains a mystery.

Initially, the district had put a pricetag of about $32.8 million to rebuild Wa-Hi. It also planned on drawing about $4 million to rebuild Lincoln Alternative High School, or the old Paine School, as part of a May 2006 proposal.

Although concerns with facilities and space at Wa-Hi appeared clear-cut as the district launched its comprehensive bond initiative last year, the needs as viewed by the community proved to be more complex.

That measure failed in the ballots, with people calling for simpler bond requests that handled one issue at a time.

With the passage of the Edison school bond earlier this year, the district is gearing up to tackle its next big project, determining how best to serve all the area's public high school students.

The district's challenge will be to find a smart, cost-effective measure with popular support that will cure overcrowding, aged structures and safety issues.

With those concerns in mind, the Walla Walla School District recently established a task force that will study the high school experience in the city until the group reaches common ground on what the students need and what the community will support.

The group hopes to address all the high school components, which include folding in the alternative high school. It may be a year or longer before the task force reaches a definitive conclusion that may then become a bond measure.

Yet many of the the needs at the high school are obvious, according to facility studies. The school has exceeded capacity. Students often complain about the open campus and cringe on days when the weather dips below freezing and they must walk though the grounds to their next classes. Heating and cooling are inadequate, and the school needs more work to be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Similar maintenance issues plague the former Paine School, which is not overcrowded but housed in an aging structure.

Superintendent Rich Carter stressed that the district does not have plans, nor a timeline, for a bond measure.

The dollar amounts offered in this series are taken from a comprehensive study conducted about two years ago in preparation for the May 2006 bond initiative.

Those amounts reflect improvements at the high school as simply one way to solve its issues.


No user avatar
unionbulletin
Latest page update: made by unionbulletin , Sep 9 2007, 12:22 PM EDT (about this update About This Update unionbulletin Edited by unionbulletin

492 words added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
Anonymous Another High Scholl Will be Needed Sooner or Later 0 Oct 1 2007, 2:22 AM EDT by Anonymous
 
Thread started: Oct 1 2007, 2:22 AM EDT  Watch
Another high scholl will be needed sooner or later. For that reason I will support the building of another high school before spending money to enlarge WW-Hi.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
Anonymous Smaller schools not the answer 1 Sep 28 2007, 9:17 PM EDT by Anonymous
 
Thread started: Sep 23 2007, 2:00 PM EDT  Watch
Having worked as a public school educator in the Puget Sound area for nearly 10 years, I have seen the "small schools" phenomenon take hold (thanks largely to the Gates Foundation's misguided charity). Now many of those schools are moving back to larger programs because students lost so many of the opportunities a larger, comprehensive school can provide. Even the Gates foundation now admits its small schools grants were a mistake! Please, Walla Walla, don't fall into the trap! Individualized attention for students is a function of staff commitment and training, NOT of school size. Don't rob your children of the opportunity to experience music, art, sports, journalism, foreign language study, business programs, agriculture, auto mechanics, technology, and other programs that KEEP KIDS IN SCHOOL. Instead, use your YES vote to support the kind of funding that will allow the school district to implement real positive change for students.
0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
Show Last Reply

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Showing 2 of 2 threads for this page